Can We Eliminate Hep C in the US? Yes

"Relatively modest investments, however, can have a big impact toward eliminating HCV."

Global health experts say elimination of hepatitis C in the US is possible: How do we make it happen?

With a growing consensus in the global health community that Hepatitis C (HCV) could be eliminated, a new report highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete elimination — adequate surveillance and monitoring — and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save money.

“Relatively modest investments, however, can have a big impact toward eliminating HCV.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that at least 3.5 million Americans currently have HCV infection, and rates of new infections have increased nearly 2.9-fold between 2010 and 2015. The latest data from 2015 indicate that an estimated 33,900 new infections occurred that year alone.

The report, “Monitoring the Hepatitis C Epidemic in the United States: What Tools are Needed to Achieve Elimination?” explains that effective medicines are available to treat and often cure hepatitis C, but information is lacking to know where to “deploy critical public health and health care resources to prevent new infections, screen and diagnose cases, and treat all of those who are infected with the virus,” write the authors.

Written by Institute Associate Sonia L. Canzater, JD, MPH and Jeffrey S. Crowley, MPH, program director of infectious disease initiatives and distinguished scholar at the O’Neill Institute, the report was developed following an expert consultation held in Washington, DC, in September 2016 with diverse stakeholders, including hepatitis C medical and non-medical providers, patient advocates, epidemiologists, and federal hepatitis C policy and program staff.

Crowley and Canzater identify five critical actions that should be priorities for monitoring HCV: 1) expand and standardize reporting to the CDC, 2) utilize electronic medical records to collect data on HCV cases and the cure cascade, 3) fund epidemiologic research using clinical data sets, 4) integrate improved monitoring of HCV with responses to the opioid epidemic, and 5) establish and monitor HCV elimination plans across major US health systems.

“Even with a constrained federal budget, more resources are needed for HCV surveillance and monitoring,” Crowley said, adding, “Relatively modest investments, however, can have a big impact toward eliminating HCV.”

Canzater said that, “Most of the newly infected HCV cases are among injection opioid drug users, but we often do not have even basic information to adequately monitor where and how the HCV epidemic is unfolding in the US and we are not using the clinical data that is already collected.” Canzater and Crowley say eliminating HCV would lead to a plummet in liver cancer rates (HCV was responsible for half of the nearly 23,000 liver cancer deaths in 2010). Almost $300 million a year in health care costs could be saved by avoiding the liver transplant surgeries caused by HCV.

Canzater and Crowley conclude, “Unlike some pressing problems where the scope of need is so large it can be immobilizing, modest new investments can have a significant impact. Boosting the capacity to monitor the HCV epidemic can move the nation toward eliminating HCV as a public health threat in the United States.”

The report is available for free on the O’Neill Institute website:

Story Source: O’Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law.


We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.


©2019 What Doctors Know

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?